Cultural Industry in the Digital Age: Human-Machine Co-Creation Reshaping Cultural Subjectivity

Download Citation

Current format Advance Online Publication
pdf (英语)

How to Cite

Sun, Q. (2026). Cultural Industry in the Digital Age: Human-Machine Co-Creation Reshaping Cultural Subjectivity. 艺术、传播与数字媒体. https://doi.org/10.68791/acdm2026003

Citing this article

This article is published as an Advance Online Publication. Volume, issue and page numbers will be assigned once it is included in a printed issue. Please cite it as:

艺术、传播与数字媒体, advance online publication, 2026-11-02, DOI: 10.68791/acdm2026003

Compliance & Registration
Editorial Note: As an invited Commentary, this article is published under the direct editorial approval of the Editor-in-Chief. In accordance with international academic publishing practice, invited commentaries are not subject to external peer review in order to maintain the timeliness and originality of academic discourse.

摘要

Digital media is deeply integrated into all aspects of cultural production, and human-machine co-creation has become a reality in the cultural industry. Technology has lowered the production threshold for cultural products and revolutionized industrial production efficiency, but the intervention of algorithms in content generation has also made the maintenance of cultural subjectivity an issue that urgently needs to be addressed. Cultural subjectivity is rooted in human life experience, value stance, and cultural memory, and is the core of cultural creation. Algorithms, based on existing data, complete symbolic recombination and imitation, lacking original emotional experience and value reflection. Over-reliance on algorithms can easily weaken creators' independent thinking and bring the risk of the erosion of cultural subjectivity. The essence of human-machine co-creation is not that machines replace humans, but that humans take the lead in driving technology. Creators should assume the roles of creative setting, content selection, and meaning interpretation, with humans controlling the cultural narrative, and AI completing auxiliary tasks such as material generation. The cultural industry takes the transmission of cultural valuesand the carrying of collective memory as its fundamental mission. Technology is merely a creative tool and cannot replace human empathy and creativity. Faced with the irreversible industry trend of human- machine co-creation, it is necessary to cultivate cultural awareness, adhere to the guidance of humanistic values, make good use of digital technology, safeguard the foundation of human cultural subjectivity, and promote the production of high-quality cultural products with warmth, stance, and local core.

DOI https://doi.org/10.68791/acdm2026003
pdf (英语)

References

  1. Song, Y. Y. Artificial intelligence-generated content drives the reconstruction of the cultural industry chain - taking short dramas and animation games as examples. China Smart Internet Development Report (2026), Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2026, 169-182.
  2. Department of Mass Communication, Coal City University. Misrepresentation, Intentional Fallacy and the Crisis of Cultural Identity in AI-Generated Content . Zenodo, 2026. https://zenodo.org/records/22866245.
  3. Roland, E.; So, R.; Long, H. The social AI author: modeling creativity and distinction in simulated cultural fields. AI & Society, 2026, 41(3), 1194-1210. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-025-02790-0.
  4. Wei, C. C. A Subjective Reflection on New Forms of Literature and Art for the General Public in the Era of Generative AI. China Literature and Art Criticism, 2026, 8, 55. DOI: 10.19324/j.cnki.zgwypl.2026.08.005.
  5. Nie, C. X. Live-Action and AI Dramas in the New Wave Face Technological Leaps and Content Restructuring. Guangming Daily, 2026-05-20.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Sun Qiong (Author)